| Lonely Planet™ · Thorn Tree Forum · 2020 | ![]() |
What are the Polynesians and other Pacificers?Country forums / Pacific Islands & Papua New Guinea | ||
Are they, like, a mix of Negro and Mongoloid, or did they evolve seperately? | ||
| 1 | |
Great link Mel! | 2 | |
How do you know how closely related I think I am, #1? Thanks for the link, but I can't find anything that answers my question. | 3 | |
| 4 | |
Please drop the attitude, mel. You make inane assumptions about me, palm me off with an overlong (for the purposes of such a straighforward question) and insufficient link (which suggests you don't know the answer and haven't read the link yourself, or you're being unnecesarily obtuse) and then insult me further, with no good reason. Why even bother replying if you don't know? | 5 | |
Nice link, and I haven't read it well so perhaps there is an update on this... but, l believe the origins of Polynesians are still controversial. Some people believe they came from Asia, and the presence of Lapita pottery is evidence for this. Other people believe they came from South America because of some of the crops used. I think the belief is that they didn't have the seafaring skills to have travelled to South America and back again (to have obtained crops that way). Still they managed to reach some fairly obscure localities (Easter Island) so obviously some people believe this was possible. | 6 | |
just realised that this probably doesn't answer your question either, but it suggests a source.... | 7 | |
irrumatio | 8 | |
the micronesians, who are seperate from the polynesians and melanesians, originated in se asia. they migrated through the islands, down to New Guinea, and then back again. You can see the tremendous variation of skin color and hair type through out Micronesia. I don't remember the details of the other two groups. There has been some interesting work done with genetics- using hair samples. It is too late for me to remember the details, but the origins are not as clear cut as they might be. | 9 | |
It's fairly unusual to have this type of poster on this branch. If you look at 'his' history he has not been a TT member long, but has flooded it with posts. | 10 | |
Thor Heyerdahl's theory of Polynesians having originated in South America is pretty much discredited these days, with just about any serious book citing the origin in SE Asia as the undisputed fact, with even the migration route taken by them well traced. | 11 | |
| 12 | ||
Here's another example of the OP's posting. | 13 | |
That Polynesian Pathways site has some wingnut ideas. | 14 | |
That PP website looks like a lunatic joke as a whole. | 15 | |
There is a theory that the people of Malaita in Solomon Islands are the lost tribes of Israel - probably no more bizarre than some others mentioned here. | 16 | |
Perhaps no more bizarre, but that is why there are so many Mormons in the islands- they teach that the Pacific Islanders (or some of them) are the lost tribes. Odd but true. | 17 | |
The Solomon Islanders that believe this aren't Mormons - they belong to the South Seas Evangelical Church, and this belief was around long before the Mormons came to Solomon Islands (which only happened in 1995). | 18 | |
| 19 | |
Basketball (and college basketball) is very big in the States. It's easier to export than baseball or (American style) football. | 20 | |